Thursday, September 26, 2013

What Does the Title “Prisoners” Mean? ***THIS WILL SPOIL THE ENTIRE FILM IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN IT***


Over the weekend I saw the film “Prisoners” twice.  This is NOT a happy, uplifting film.  This is a film about two children who are kidnapped on Thanksgiving Day in broad daylight.  So why did I see it twice?  Why did I put myself through that intense, brutal emotion?  The answer is because I couldn’t NOT see the film again.

“Prisoners” has a simple premise: kidnapping.  The premise is simple, yes, but the film is far from it; a major reason being the main characters and what they represent:

Keller Dover: 

Played flawlessly by Hugh Jackman, is a father trying to find his daughter; simple?  No.  Keller IS a father BUT he is also incredibly flawed and in my eyes disturbed.  Something haunts this man.  Something haunted this man way before his daughter was taken.  It could have been his father’s suicide but I feel it is more than just that.  Keller’s past haunts him.  He is an alcoholic although it is only spoke of in two lines in the film.  He is also a violent man.  The film begs the question, was the violence brought out due to a horrible situation OR was it coming inevitably?  That I do not know, but it is a question and I do wonder.  Was this man always haunted by violence OR was it this due to this terrible ordeal?  My inclination is his anger and violence came out do this terrible, violent ordeal.  That being said, there is/was darkness in Keller Dover and no one had to point it out to us (the audience).  All of this came out organically through story, something not often seen nowadays. 

So, Keller Dover was disturbed, was violent and was prepared for anything.  One of his first lines in the film is to his son, saying something to the effect of: the best thing your grandfather taught me was always be prepared.  Oil goes dry, no food in the grocery stores.  People turn on each other.  Keller was prepared.  He was prepared for everything as his basement shows.  He is stocked for the apocalypse with guns, ammunition, food, water, a gas mask and many other things.  This man was prepared for anything and everything, accept what happened to his family, what happened to his daughter.  He wasn’t prepared for her to be taken.  He couldn’t be.  No one could.  This is a horror no parent expects or can imagine and Keller wasn’t prepared but he did turn on people.  As he stated in that line, HE turned on people. 

I think in many ways Keller turned into whatever he despised or was running from.  Keller went from victim father, to perpetrator kidnapper.  When the police let a suspect go due to lack of evidence Keller Dover becomes a man obsessed.  He becomes so obsessed he tortures, starves and beats a man with the IQ of a 10 year old.  So, did the victim remain the victim or become the perpetrator or both?  I say, both.

Detective Loki:

The best performance I’ve ever seen from Jake Gyllenhaal.  It is stated very early in the film that Loki has a 100% success rate.  He saves people.  A lot of people had issues with Loki’s eye twitch.  I found it very, very interesting because ever time Loki twitches, it is an intense or important scene.  There is brief mention that Loki was in a boys home… is that why he has the twitch?  Every time Detective Loki was in a scene I couldn’t help but focus on the pain behind his eyes.  Was Loki hurt as a child, kidnapped, molested?  I tend to think so.  He is SO focused, he doesn’t sleep.  He doesn’t have a family.  After all, the first time we meet him is Thanksgiving night and he is eating dinner at a Chinese food restaurant ALONE.

When Loki works this case, when he interrogates suspects, you see it in his eyes.  He is NOT okay.  This is a damaged man.  This is a hurting man and this is another man who is obsessed.  He is obsessed with helping find people who were hurt.  Does this represent his past the way the violence represents Keller’s?  I think so.  Loki goes to the home of a suspect to talk to their aunt.  The suspect is the man with the IQ of a 10 year old who Keller kidnaps.  In the man’s possessions, Loki finds a toy car.  This seems like nothing in that scene, but later it is not.  When the case for the girls goes cold after a suspect who may have the girls dies, Loki goes to his desk, smashes everything on it and we once again see that toy.  He takes that toy and like a child pushes it back and forth, once again the pain behind his eyes.  This man is as damaged as Keller but for very different reasons. 

In the end of the film, the man Keller tortured turns out to be a drugged kidnapped man himself.  So lost, so drugged, he now has the IQ of a 10 year old boy.  That man did lead Keller to his daughter’s kidnapper but instead of trusting the police, Keller took matters into his own hands and winds up in a hole, with a bullet in his leg, still without his daughter.  Loki finds the kidnapper and saves Keller’s daughter.  The last scene of the film is Loki and the police at the kidnapper’s home casing the ground because numerous children had been kidnapped over time.  As it begins to snow and the ground goes cold, the police leave.  We, the audience know Keller is in a hole - not fifty feet from Loki with a whistle but Loki, does not.  The lights go out and the wind picks up.  There is a faint whistle blow.  Loki looks around and decides it’s the wind.  This happens twice more and then the whistle blows loud.  Loki looks to the direction of the hole and the screen blacks out and the word PRISONERS appears.

In my eyes, the word PRISONERS appearing shows that every character in the film is a prisoner.  The girls were prisoners to their captors.  Keller was a prisoner to his violence and his past and Loki was a prisoner to his past and his obsession to his work.  They are all prisoners to something….
The film asks us, what are we prisoners to?
    
     - George McCann

No comments:

Post a Comment